Megan Casebier

Case study · Obie, 2023

From 496 quote requests to one list of people and homes

When Obie opened its platform to independent agents, the page they’d live in was built for our own brokers. I redesigned what it was organized around. Three years later, it’s one of the most-used pages in the product.

Role
Senior Product Designer, research and design lead
Timeline
Apr – Dec 2023, then ongoing
Team
A PM, engineering, agency distribution, risk, marketing and support
Status
Live since December 2023

The page agents would live in

Before 2023, quotes at Obie lived on a Quotes tab built for our internal brokers. Every quote request got its own card. Every card carried about a dozen jobs:

  • change the status, by hand
  • assign it
  • broker notes
  • view the request, client details
  • add a carrier, attach documents
  • download the coverage PDF, a ZIP of generated documents
  • shortcuts to customization and signature, behind a row of unlabeled icons

Its main button opened a long page of raw underwriting answers.

That worked for a handful of brokers who knew it by heart. It wasn’t going to work for independent agents, who were about to become the people using it most. In research with more than ten people across brokers, agents and internal staff, the clearest finding was how fragmented agents’ days already were: each property ran through three to five different portals. Ours couldn’t be another one they had to decode.

My 2023 Quotes Tab Breakdown board. The old quote-request card sits at the centre, with arrows from each of its controls to where it led: a status menu, an assignment list, broker notes, a long page of raw underwriting answers, the coverage PDF, a ZIP of generated documents, and the customization and signature screens. A list beside it names the card’s jobs, from changing the quote status to the signature page shortcut. Names and carriers in the test data are blurred.
My 2023 teardown of the old Quotes tab: a dozen jobs on every card. Names and carriers in the test data are blurred.

The reframe: agents don’t manage quote requests

The old page counted 496 quote requests. But an agent doesn’t think in quote requests. They think about a client and a property, and about what happens next. Re-quote the same house three times and the old page showed three strangers.

So the Leads tab is organized around the lead: one client, one address. Every quote version for that property sits under it, with the most recent one forward and the rest one tab away.

That’s a decision about the data, not the layout, and engineering built to it. Quote versions became something the system groups, not something an agent has to remember.

Before: a card per quote request

  • Quote request · Elm Street
  • Quote request · Elm Street
  • Quote request · Elm Street

After: a card per lead

Elm Street, for one client

  • Current quote
  • Previous quote
  • Previous quote
The same house quoted three times: three strangers before, one lead with its quote versions after.

Status became a system, not a dropdown

On the old tab, a person set the status by hand, so it was only as true as the last person to touch it. The Leads tab derives it: Quote Started, Active, Declined, Expired, Signed, Bound. Nobody sets it; the quote’s actual state does.

Getting there meant mapping the cases nobody draws until they happen:

  • an agent who starts a quote and never finishes
  • one who comes back in under 60 days, or after 61
  • a quote declined, then re-run successfully
  • a lead that expires and is run again

Expired leads and expired quotes look the same to an agent, but stay separate in the data for reporting. A lead shows a date; a quote shows a date and time.

One button that knows where you’re going

The old card’s main action opened a data dump. The new one is a single button, Continue to Quote, that takes the agent wherever that lead needs to go next:

The lead’s stateContinue to Quote takes you to
No package chosen yetThe package selection screen
Required fields missingQuote customization
Ready to bindThe binding link, ready to copy
SignedPayment
BoundThe policy
ExpiredRegenerate the quote
Quote started, or declinedNothing to do yet, so no button pushes you anywhere

The rest moved into a details drawer: carrier, premium, limits, deductible, effective and expiry dates, the quote PDF, and the next step, in that order. That’s the order an agent checks them in.

My handwritten note above the design reads: Active quote, take them to magic link if all required fields are filled out to bind. Below it, the Leads tab with one lead listed and its details drawer open. The drawer shows the address and client, Current Quote and Previous Quotes tabs, then status, quote author, quote ID, carrier, premium, building limit, deductible, named insured, effective date, expiration, a Download PDF link and a Copy Binding Link next step, with Close and Continue to Quote buttons at the bottom. The carrier value is masked. All data is fictional.
The Leads tab with the details drawer open. All data is fictional.

“The leads tab drawer is much more accessible for IAs.”

Agency-success lead, 2025

What we took away

About a dozen card actions didn’t make the move:

  • manual status
  • assignment
  • broker notes
  • the ZIP download
  • the icon shortcuts

Research showed nobody was using them, and the team worked through each removal in an open session, so nobody was surprised on launch day.

Launch had bumps. In the first weeks, staff and agents told us bound policies were harder to reach from the new tab than the old one, and we changed how previous quotes behave by February. Support questions about where a quote stood dropped after launch.

Three years later

The Leads tab went live for everyone, independent agents included, on December 19, 2023, alongside Sign & Bind, with an in-app announcement, tutorial videos and an email. I’ve kept working on it: the quote-history logic in 2024, a revamp round that spring, and a brand refresh in 2025 that I directed with our UI designer on visuals.

In the last 90 days (to October 17, 2026):

None of the removed actions show up among the page’s most-used controls today. Nobody went looking for them.

Credits

Made with a product manager, engineering, agency distribution, risk and underwriting, marketing and support, and a second designer who contributed alternative UI explorations. All data shown is fictional.